An explanation, not an excuse

 

I'm here - go there

Meet Adrian Allotey, a friend and trusted colleague

This terrific video is a great way for you to begin to know an amazing person, Ms Adrian Allotey

Take the introduction further at You Are Not Alone Elder Care

The problem is crappy presentations

I posed the following questions at the gated online community run by the national office of the specialty nursing organization to which I pay annual dues:

Why are continuing education units measured by quantity (time, contact hours) and not quality (learner objectives achieved)? Why should a 15-minute continuing ed program (including post test and evaluation) where learners achieve 2 or 3 meaningful objectives be valued as "less than" a one hour death by power point?

A colleague took exception to the phrase, "death by power point," and seemed to feel I was being judgmental or dismissive of educators who develop one hour power point presentations.

My response

Hi, Colleague

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this 

Learners’ time is valuable - I expect every educator to invest effort in their presentations

Steve Jobs used this formula for his 1-hour presentations: 30/30/30
30 hours to brainstorm
30 hours to develop
30 hours to refine/rehearse

I didn’t invent the term, “Death by PowerPoint,” but it’s an alternative to “crappy presentations”

Before PowerPoint there were 35mm slides in a Carousel

Before that we used overhead transparencies - remember those?

How to avoid death by PowerPoint
David JP Phillips - TEDxStockholmSalon

LINK IS HERE

Here’s a good example of an awful slide from a presentation at the in-person conference of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) held September 23 - 26, 2021 in Florida

Dr Ruffin is expert, but slides like this mean important concepts get lost and people zone out. Check any other presentations at this or any other nursing conference and I guarantee you'll see the same awful slides over and over and over.

I use Google slides and my 1 hour presentations have included anywhere from 12 +/- to close to 300 depending. The average lately has been about 150 and since I’ve only been doing remote what’s on the screen has to hold attention and drive the narrative - I’m in the little corner square

13 slides in a blog post - ELNEC ethics presentation

10 slides in a blog post - Existential Distress, Dignity Therapy, and Peaceful Death, based on Keall, R. Clayton, J. Butow, P. Australian Palliative Care Nurses’ Reflections on Existential/Spiritual Interventions. J Hosp Pal Nsg 2014;16(2):105-112.

134 slides in a presentation - Celebrating Nurses Again with Free Self-Paced Online Learning - End of Life Trajectories, includes a chronology of my wife Jeanne’s and my experience 2010-2016 as case example

I’ve been sitting through presentations in academic, business and clinical settings since 1973 up until minutes ago for that TEDx - in my experience the good ones are hard to find and the outstanding ones come by rarely but you know it when you see it

I don't think I'm an outlier when I say the vast majority of presentations I've ever seen are painfully awful. 

I think it’s because an effective presentation takes time and effort - 30/30/30 for an hour seems about right if you’re looking to activate and inspire, which is what outstanding teaching is about

Good teaching generates discussion

Mediocre teaching conveys information

If you’re only going to read one thing read this

“Robert Gaskins invented PowerPoint. He led its initial design and development at a startup, where the idea attracted the first venture capital investment ever made by Apple Computer. PowerPoint was released for Macintosh in 1987, and soon afterward, it became the first significant acquisition ever made by Microsoft, who set up a new business unit in Silicon Valley to develop it further. Gaskins headed this new Microsoft unit for another five years, completing versions of the PowerPoint product which contributed to the explosive early growth of Microsoft Windows and to the dominance of Microsoft Office.”

Excerpt from a detailed critique by Edward Tufte, “PowerPoint Does Rocket Science--and Better Techniques for Technical Reports”

That’s what I think about this, anyway

Peace, and don't forget there's a pandemic still raging

To approach suffering

from a work in progress

The Death Nurse Cookbook! Yogurt!

It's a presentation

Also too: Yes, Whey: 

How Yogurt's Leftovers Are Getting a Second Life

The problem is crappy corporate hospice

How do you like the tea?

The discussion continues at our private nursing club.

A colleague writes: "... we often are challenged in meeting physical needs alone, much less holistic needs."

I respond: Medicare's Conditions of Participation are clear - the hospice must meet the patient's and family's physical, emotional, and spiritual needs (see 418.100 below).

Hospice nurses aren't expected to do everything, and shouldn't try - that's what the IDT is for.

The colleague continues: "...few of us have the ability to meet both physical and emotional needs given our workload..."

I think my colleague hit the nail on the head!

We need to talk about crappy corporate hospices that abuse their staff.

They most often do it with high case loads, making case managers cover off-hours, and urgent demands to "drop everything" at the last minute for an admission, but they also have plenty of other ways...

Here's what I think - there are 3 important questions anyone should ask up front when assessing a hospice, whether as a potential patient and family or as a possible employee:

1. Does the hospice have enough staff?

2. Are they (the staff) any good?

3. Who are they (the staff)?

If they don't have enough staff, the rest doesn't matter.

If they won't openly answer the questions, they've told you plenty about who they are.

Here's another important question - who owns you?

There's a fundamental difference between the original vision of community-based not for profit hospice developed in the mid-late 1970's that served as the model for the Medicare hospice benefit, and the for profit corporate hospice that now dominates our space. (pdf 'Facts & Figures: Hospice Care in America (August 20, 2020) page 21, figure 22 "Tax Status")****

Corporate hospice is the greatest threat to effective and compassionate care in serious illness at end of life. 

Corporate hospice is crappy hospice. Not for profit hospices can also be crappy hospices, especially when they try to act like for profit corporate hospice.

I've worked at 5 hospices. One was acquired and no longer exists. That transition was traumatic, with month after month of service failures and high staff turnover - broken bodies on the floor that the acquirer shrugged off as just the cost of doing business. I found that organizational culture rancid.

Another was a VNA that had acquired the hospice and home care business of another agency just before I arrived, and acquired an even bigger agency before I left less than a year later - nonstop chaos. That was 8 years ago, every exec but one got fired or beat feet with exec turnover twice, the place is still a mess, and their ownership is once again up in the air...

I got out of the one big for-profit hospice I worked at as fast as I could, and marked it down as a bad job choice. They're still in "growth mode" and privately held, so no chance for any financial disclosures. They just merged with another big privately-held corporate hospice, because now the name of the game is get as big as you can as fact as you can.

Folks need to follow what's going on in "the industry" by learning to access and understand IRS 990's, SEC filings, and basic management accounting.

Based on my personal experience in metropolitan Boston, there's one agency I recommend without hesitation; one I suggest if there were no alternatives; and two that I advise, "run away!"

I've been in nursing since 1973, and my clinical practice has always been in high-mortality settings: critical care in community hospitals and major medical centers; outpatient hemodialysis; and hospice. The work is always challenging - but it's also very doable in the right environment with the support of a good team and an employer that cares about the mission.

That's not always the case.

My heart breaks for colleagues who endure abuse and overcome obstacles from their employers and managers just for wanting to do the right thing - they're being subjected to moral distress and PTSD. It's less evident in this closed community than in other more open forums but nurses are breaking, and being broken.

Now that "gaslighting" is a more widely-understood phenomenon, it's also possible to more accurately describe and understand the actions and motivations of others who insist. "Things really aren't so bad, we're all in this together, this is what you signed up for, just do what you can, it's just tax status, etc."

I've been on "both sides of the bed," as the primary caregiver to my wife Jeanne - also a nurse and educator - through our trajectory from the initial diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment to her peaceful death at home. I had to keep my eyes sharp for crappy care even as an "informed insider," including with folks in hospice.

Our system is a minefield. Patients and families need guidance, someone to join them, and I don't think it's too much to expect hospice clinicians to have the skill, compassion, and opportunities to guide them. It's actually required, so...

I think it's great for patients and families to have an advocate and ally in healthcare throughout the lifespan. So much more is possible if they have an established and trusted relationship with someone, as our colleague in the private club described her own practice in the Zoom meeting she hosted. 

I hired a private caregiver 32 hours/week (4 x 8) in Jeanne's last months, was able to keep it together for two years thanks to a caregiver support group, and took advantage of opportunities to consult with others whenever I needed an objective assessment.

But if Jeanne and I had encountered crappy hospice, and if that crappy hospice said, "You need a doula…" or, "We're going to send you a doula…" or, "Maybe you should take doula training…"

No, just no.

Also too I think online doula training for $$$ is problematic. Always ask, "Whose needs are being met?"

Let's pay attention to what really matters - patients and families facing serious illness and end of life.

Thanks for reading. See you next time.

*** "Tax Status" is both accurate and misleading - misleading because the operative concept here isn't taxes it's "PROFIT."

+++

From CFR Title 42 Chapter IV Subchapter B PART 418 - HOSPICE CARE

Subpart D - Conditions of Participation: Organizational Environment

    418.100 Conditions of Participation: Organization and administration of services

        (a) Standard: Serving the hospice patient and family. The hospice must provide hospice care that-

            (1) Optimizes comfort and dignity; and

            (2) Is consistent with patient and family needs and goals, with patient needs and goals as priority.

        (c) Standard: Services.

            (1) A hospice must be primarily engaged in providing the following care and services and must do so in a manner that is consistent with accepted standards of practice:

                (i) Nursing services

                (ii) Medical social services

                (iii) Physician services

                (iv) Counseling services, including spiritual counseling, dietary counseling, and bereavement counseling

                (v) Hospice aide, volunteer, and homemaker services

                (vi) Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services

                (vii) Short-term inpatient care

                (viii) Medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals) and medical appliances

Work in progress - Topics in dementia: Inequity Disparity

It's a slide presentation